stats4PT
What can observations warrant?
Clinical inquiry
Instantiation is the work of bringing population evidence, mechanisms, and movement knowledge into a patient-specific model that can be questioned, revised, and acted upon without hiding uncertainty.
Instantiation
Evidence describes groups, mechanisms describe possible processes, and models organize relationships. None of those is yet a conclusion about one person.
The clinician instantiates that knowledge by mapping it to the person’s observations, history, goals, environment, response over time, and plausible alternatives. The resulting model is provisional: useful enough to guide the next action, explicit enough to revise.
Clinical Inquiry Ecosystem
Sean Collins’s broader program separates discovery, mechanism, movement-domain scholarship, knowledge integration, and patient-specific inference so each can be inspected on its own terms.
What can observations warrant?
How are effects generated?
How is movement produced and changed?
How does the knowledge fit together?
What may be true for this person?
This is a conceptual and scholarly flow, not an automated pipeline. Each project remains independently governed and versioned.
Safeguards
Group estimates constrain reasoning; they do not substitute for individual findings and context.
A visible pattern may have multiple sufficient mechanisms, and the same mechanism may produce different patterns.
Models are explicit tools for inquiry. Their omissions, uncertainty, and revision history remain visible.
Movement gives clinical inquiry something indispensable: